Friday 20 May 2016

A Joint Statement from the National Churches

The Churches Network for Gypsies, Travellers and Roma notes with concern the distress caused to Gypsy and Traveller communities by the new Planning Policy for Traveller sites issued in August 2015..  As Churches we have a responsibility to affirm, welcome and celebrate the many diverse ethnicities and cultures and challenge all forms of social exclusion and marginalisation, and we share the concern of Gypsies and Travellers about the impact this policy will have on their lives. Of all the guidance in the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites, the part that has caused greatest anxiety is the definition of Gypsies and Travellers which effectively removes Gypsy or Traveller status for people who have settled permanently. This denies to people in “bricks and mortar” (houses) the aspiration to live within the customs of their culture.  To people on private or council-run Traveller sites it raises fears about the security of their tenure.  In particular, people with temporary planning permission for a Traveller site are fearful that their home will cease to attract planning permission when the period of the temporary permission has expired, and that they will then face eviction.
Travellers have seen this measure in the context of other guidance and legislation which has impacted on their way of life, and have expressed deep concern that there appears to be a political agenda of forced assimilation which would result in the loss of their culture and identity. That is why the demonstrators In Parliament Square on Saturday will meet under the theme of “Dosta Grinta” – “Enough is Enough”.

Yours truly,

Revd Martin Burrell, Chair, Churches Network for Gypsies, Travellers and Roma
Yogi Sutton, Chair, Catholic Association for Racial Justice
Dr Elizabeth Henry, National Adviser, Council for Minority Ethnic Anglican Concerns
Revd. Wale Hudson-Roberts, Racial Justice Advisor, Baptist Union of Great Britain
Revd Dr Michael Jagessar,
Racial Justice and Intercultural Ministry, United Reformed Church
Lt-Col Melvin Fincham, Secretary for Communications, Salvation Army

The Churches Network for Gypsies, Travellers and Roma is a group of and for Christians of all denominations and for Gypsies, Travellers and Roma themselves.  Its primary aim is to work for harmony, understanding and co-operation between communities, churches and Gypsy, Traveller and Roma people.


Wednesday 11 May 2016

Churches Network for Gypsies, Travellers and Roma: Annual Report for 2015-16

Photographs by kind permission of Joe Windas, Mary Bird and Lee Hughes


The past year has been a very difficult one for all organisations working with Gypsies, Travellers and Roma. The government has been reluctant to consult with Gypsies, Travellers and Roma, or with their organisations even as we have seen a flood of legislation which directly or indirectly brings them huge disadvantages.  The cover pictures are a reminder of the Control of Horses Act, 2015, which is already having devastating effects on horse-drawn Travellers in some parts of the country. As a Dorset Traveller pointed out, “When they seize a man’s horse, they have no idea of the value of that animal to the owner.  His livelihood and all he possesses depends on that horse.”  This did not initially receive much publicity, until the “Countryfile” item which revealed that 80% of horses seized had been destroyed. Travellers have kindly provided the photographs on the front cover to represent their horses, and these images speak volumes about the deep bond that exists between them and their beautiful and beloved horses.

The bringing into force of the dreaded new Planning Policy Guidance for Traveller sites on 31st August was remarked upon immediately by alert lawyers, and was dismayingly unaltered from the original disastrous proposals.  This flew in the face of many well-argued consultation responses which pointed out the possible consequences of making it virtually impossible for Gypsies and Travellers to provide their own sites, as they had been urged to do at the time of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. The sinister removal of Traveller status from people who had settled permanently for whatever reason has caused enormous dismay to all Gypsies and Travellers, who feel that their very existence as culturally distinct ethnic groups is threatened.

The Housing and Planning Bill introduced in Parliament in the autumn of 2015 included a clause which removed from local authorities the duty to assess the accommodation needs of Gypsies and Travellers. Again, this was noted quite quickly, but despite representations which pointed out the impact on these hugely disadvantaged and marginalised groups of people, the government has declined to remove this clause.

The Horse Passport Regulations 2009 already required horses to be microchipped when owners applied for a passport but the difficulty of complying when owners had no fixed abode appears not to have resulted in any guidance on how to proceed in such cases.  It was therefore not surprising that the Microchipping for Dogs (England) Regulations 2015 similarly overlooked this difficulty. Only in Wales, it seems, was this noted as an area that required further guidance, but guidance has not been forthcoming. For nomadic Travellers, their dogs are an important means of supplementing income by trading or breeding, so this apparently well-intentioned measure is also a further deprivation with, as yet, no remedy.

We note that organisations representing Gypsies and Travellers have now said “Dosta!” (Enough!) and have banded together under the leadership of the Traveller Movement to plan a march of protest in May. This will focus particularly on the Planning Policy Guidance as the most detrimental of all the measures introduced in the past year. This was also the strong feeling of the meeting we held in Marsden, Kent in September 2015, where Romani Gypsies were strongly represented.

For Eastern European Roma un the United Kingdom there is  also considerable anxiety as we approach the referendum about membership of the European Union. If we leave the EU, a host of questions will need to be addressed for which at the present there are no answers.   Although under the radar, the Eastern European Roma community in the UK is huge and still growing.   

The Churches Network seeks to ground all we do in the Gospel of liberation we share and seek to proclaim.   Our vision is of one people of God united through the cross in which we already have the victory.  We believe we have a crucial role to be bearers of hope to a people who have all but lost hope.  To achieve this we need to find a way to draw in the leaders of the GTR churches in the UK.   

As followers of Jesus Christ we accept his divine commission to the poor, the oppressed and the marginalised. Our hope is that we can so present what we believe to be God’s call to us that all the national churches will join us in speaking out to explain the harm that is being done to people already suffering severe disadvantages.

Progress since last year

 Last year’s Business Plan set the following targets:

·         Recruit more members from Gypsy, Traveller and Roma communities
·         Identify key social justice issues which Gypsies, Travellers and Roma need us to address.
·         Plan ways in which these can be tackled.
·         Begin implementing plans
·         Continue programme of awareness raising events.
·         Plan ways of engaging each of the national churches represented, at both national and local level
·         Hold a meeting in Kent
·         Plan further meetings in different areas and contact Christian faiths in that area in order to invite their participation
·         Aim to encourage one-off road shows, ideally provided through regional structures.

Progress has been made as follows:

Ø   Membership
The email list now stands at 57 people, plus 2 contactable only by phone, which compares with 56 people last year.  Since the names of people whose emails always bounced back undelivered have been deleted, this represents more of a gain than first appears. We do not operate any ethnic monitoring, but it is probably fair to say that only one of the new people on the list is a Romani, and another is a Roma.  The facebook group membership is now 83, compared with 26 last year, and ethnic Travellers are probably better represented here.  In fact, the group is very useful for networking, with members providing the photographs on the cover, and volunteering to author articles for the CMEAC book of minority ethnic saints.

Nevertheless, our meeting in Kent demonstrated the willingness of Travellers to participate at a venue accessible to them, and with hosts whom they knew.  This suggests that we should consider progressing regional structures where possible.

Ø   Key social justice issues
The key social issue identified in Kent was the impact of the Policy Planning Guidance for Traveller sites which was issued on 31st August.  This is also the issue which has brought Traveller organisations together to plan a protest.

Since then a demonstration in London has also protested against the clause in the Housing and Planning Bill which removed the local authorities’ duty to assess the accommodation needs of Gypsies and Travellers.

Traveller organisations and our own members appear not to have picked up the issue of the astonishing over-representation of Traveller children in custody, and the fact that they are significantly more likely to have bad experiences in custody than all other groups of children. (HM Inspector of Prisons, “Children in Custody, 2015) However, a CNGTR member brought this to the attention of the Bishop of Rochester, who holds a brief for prisons in the House of Lords.


Ø   Planning ways in which key issues can be tackled
Our main proposal at present is to issue a statement explaining why the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites is so disastrous for the communities we seek to serve. The hope is to bring in as many Christian denominations as possible, and thereby rise awareness within the churches as well as among the wider public.

Since any such statement will be at best ephemeral, we need to consider further ways of spreading the argument for a more helpful policy.

Implementation of this plan has begun by contacting all the major denominations at national level.

Ø   Programme of awareness raising events
There were no awareness raising events organised by the Network in 2015-16, although one member organised a major event in her home cathedral, and one diocese again sent Holocaust Memorial Day liturgy suggestions to all incumbents, including mention of the Roma and Sinti victims.

Ø    Planning ways of engaging each of the national churches, at both                                              national and local level
We have been delighted to welcome into the network representation from the Roman Catholic Church, the Baptist Church, the Salvation Army and the United Reformed Church. Some of these representatives are not often available in person, but their support is nevertheless greatly valued.

Ø        Meeting in Kent
We were very grateful to Olby and Gary Brazil and their families for generously hosting our September meeting free of charge in the South East Romany Museum. The Romany people of Kent were strongly represented at this meeting, which included worship and a bring-and-share lunch as well as a discussion of business.

Ø        Planning further meetings in other areas, inviting representatives of
      Christian faiths in that area.
A meeting in Essex has been proposed, and we will need to consider how to involve the local churches.

Ø        Encouraging one-off road shows
On 16th June the Diocese of Southwell and Nottingham held a day conference and exhibition to raise awareness of Gypsy Traveller culture, history and lifestyle in the State Chamber of the Archbishop’s Palace in Southwell.  Two members were programmed to take part as key speakers. 



Financing the network
The Network started the financial year with £125 in the bank, and during the year received gits and membership contributions totalling £175. Payments of £30 and £19.24 were made for a senior railcard and an inkjet cartridge, both for the secretary, and the Network therefore ends the year with £250.76 in the bank.

This upward trajectory in the funding is due to the generosity of the Church of England, which makes our usual venue available free of charge as well as contributing financially, to Salisbury Diocese, which funds travel for three of our members and last but not least to our members, who contribute financially as well as bearing the cost of travel to meetings. We are enormously grateful to Olby and Gary Brazil for making us so welcome free of charge at the South East Romany Museum and regard this as a useful model for meetings outside of London.

It would be greatly appreciated if the secretary were also permitted to make claims for telephone calls, postage and stationery, and this should still leave us with a small but growing amount of funding, some of which we could use for our proposed “roadshow” events.

Conclusion
We give thanks to God for one another, for the wonderful Gospel we share and for his consistent assurance of his love for people of every tribe and language and people and nation. As we commit ourselves to showing that love especially to people who suffer discrimination, disadvantage and sometimes extreme prejudice, we give thanks especially that Jesus constantly renews our hope, even in the darkest days. As we seek to bring light where there is darkness, our business plan for 2016-17 needs to build on our successes of 2015-16, and address those parts of our aims which have yet to be met.  

Wednesday 30 March 2016

Enough!


The past year has been a very difficult one for all organisations working with Gypsies, Travellers and Roma. The government has been reluctant to consult with Gypsies, Travellers and Roma, or with their organisations  even as we have seen a flood of legislation which directly or indirectly brings them huge disadvantages.  The cover pictures are a reminder of the Control of Horses Act, 2015, which is already having devastating effects on horse-drawn Travellers in some parts of the country. As a Dorset Traveller pointed out, “When they seize a man’s horse, they have no idea of the value of that animal to the owner.  His livelihood and all he possesses depends on that horse.”  This did not initially receive much publicity, until the “Countryfile” item which revealed that 80% of horses seized had been destroyed. Travellers have kindly provided the photographs above to represent their horses, and these images speak volumes about the deep bond that exists between them and their beautiful and beloved horses.

The bringing into force of the dreaded new Planning Policy Guidance for Traveller sites on 31st August was remarked upon immediately by alert lawyers, and was dismayingly unaltered from the original disastrous proposals.  This flew in the face of many well-argued consultation responses which pointed out the possible consequences of making it virtually impossible for Gypsies and Travellers to provide their own sites, as they had been urged to do at the time of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. The sinister removal of Traveller status from people who had settled permanently for whatever reason has caused enormous dismay to all Gypsies and Travellers, who feel that their very existence as culturally distinct ethnic groups is threatened.

The Housing and Planning Bill introduced in Parliament in the autumn of 2015 included a clause which removed from local authorities the duty to assess the accommodation needs of Gypsies and Travellers. Again, this was noted quite quickly, but despite representations which pointed out the impact on these hugely disadvantaged and marginalised groups of people, the government has declined to remove this clause.

The Horse Passport Regulations 2009 already required horses to be microchipped when owners applied for a passport but the difficulty of complying when owners had no fixed abode appears not to have resulted in any guidance on how to proceed in such cases.  It was therefore not surprising that the Microchipping for Dogs (England) Regulations 2015 similarly overlooked this difficulty. Only in Wales, it seems, was this noted as an area that required further guidance, but guidance has not been forthcoming. For nomadic Travellers, their dogs are an important means of supplementing income by trading or breeding, so this apparently well-intentioned measure is also a further deprivation with, as yet, no remedy.

We note that organisations representing Gypsies and Travellers have now said “Dosta!” (Enough!) and have banded together under the leadership of the Traveller Movement to plan a march of protest in May. This will focus particularly on the Planning Policy Guidance as the most detrimental of all the measures introduced in the past year. This was also the strong feeling of the meeting we held in Marsden, Kent in September 2015, where Romani Gypsies were strongly represented.

As followers of Jesus Christ the Churches Network for Gypsies, Travellers and Roma accepts his divine commission to the poor, the oppressed and the marginalised. Our hope is that we can so present what we believe to be God’s call to us that all the national churches will join us in speaking out to explain the harm that is being done to people already suffering severe disadvantages.

Photographs courtesy of Joe Windas, Mary Bird and Lee Hughes


Monday 21 March 2016

For ALL the saints!

I wonder why the saints in our stained glass windows are often not just European-looking, but also excessively white?

Ethnic minority ordinands reportedly say that the theology taught in our training colleges and universities is also stiflingly Eurocentric.

These thoughts were suggested to me by the person who leads the Council for Minority Ethnic Anglican Concerns (CMEAC), Dr Elizabeth Henry. CMEAC is hoping to publish a book to mark its 30th anniversary, and it will be about the saints of minority ethnic groups.

As secretary of the Churches Network for Gypsies, Travellers and Roma, I have been asked to find someone who is Romani to write a chapter about a Romani saint. If you are interested, please text message me on 0751 811 7798. Likewise if you are a Scottish, Irish or Welsh Traveller, willing to write about one of your saints.

Sunday 24 January 2016

Panto and Prejudice


I love village pantomimes. It's great to see the children taking part, and to hear all the young voices yelling out from the audience.  It's comical to see the pantomime dame trying hard to convey that he would never normally enjoy drag, even as he minces limp-wristed around the stage. It's awesome to see the talent that you'd never suspect producing wonderful performances and some truly excellent scenery and costumes.

So it was disappointing to come away from our local panto feeling uncomfortable and guilty.

You see, the baddie had an ally who was just as black-hearted as he was, and the villain was a Gypsy. Well, I'm all for equality - why not a Gypsy?  What made me feel uncomfortable was the racist stereotyping that all those happy young people might take away with them as possibly the only thing anyone had ever told them about Gypsies. The brewing up of poisons was one example.  The stealing of fair-haired children was another.

What would you have done?  What would Jesus have done?  I felt it was wrong to just be silent, but probably hugely counter-productive to make a fuss.

When the organist played "The Old Rugged Cross" in church this morning, I thought it was possibly a little nod towards the spirituality of the Romani people, and was momentarily comforted. But when I asked him, it was in fact a memory of a Billy Graham crusade.

So what do I do now?  All suggestions gratefully received. What God has to say about it was displayed in the cathedral when I got my Permission To Officiate.  God is on the side of freedom and justice. The reading this morning reinforced that. But just being FROG (fully reliant on God) feels a bit like just standing by. We can't just turn a blind eye. Can we?  Again?

Saturday 16 January 2016

A Sinti boxer in Nazi Germahy




The theme of this year's Holocaust Memorial Day is "Don't stand by".  This heart-breaking story of a talented young boxer in Nazi Germany is a good illustration of why we should not stand by.

Tuesday 5 January 2016

"They're trying to legislate us off the face of the earth"

New Planning Policy Guidance, its context and its impact

Context
Caravan Sites Act 1968
            Created a duty for local authorities to provide caravan sites for Gypsies residing in or resorting to their area.  Never enforced, and never implemented by some authorities, it nevertheless resulted in a reduction in unauthorised encampments, and the provision of approximately 300 sites, providing about 5,000 pitches by the time the relevant sections of the Act were repealed.

Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
            Removed the duty to provide sites, and resulted in an almost complete halt in the provision of local authority sites.
            The rationale was that Gypsies and Travellers should provide their own sites, which many attempted to do.  However, planning law and local prejudice have combined to create a severe limiting effect on new sites, and many who have won planning permission on appeal have only temporary planning permission.

            Created a criminal offence if anyone remained on land where they had parked up or returned to it, after being directed to move. (A police direction did not require a court order.  This was so draconian, and placed such stress on Travellers’ health, welfare and educational opportunities that many police forces have been sparing in the use of this power.) Local authorities and others had the option of obtaining a court order, which could also result in a criminal conviction, followed by prison, a substantial fine, and/or the seizing of living accommodation if not complied with. This power has been used so extensively, that families have suffered a constant cycle of evictions, with serious consequences for their well-being, access to health care, access to education, and opportunities for social inclusion. Many Travellers now find travelling impossible for these reasons.

Housing Act 2004
            Required local authorities to assess the accommodation needs of Gypsies and Travellers when drawing up their local plans.

The Housing and Planning Bill 2015/16
            Contains a clause (Section 5, clause 84) which removes the requirement for local authorities to carry out an accommodation needs assessment for Gypsies and Travellers.


Planning Policy for Traveller Sites 2015
Ø      Defines Gypsy or Traveller to exclude people who have settled permanently.

Ø      Makes planning permission for sites on Green Belt land almost impossible.  Exceptional needs such as disability, ill health or old age will no longer be considered to “outweigh the harm to the Green Belt”. The government acknowledge that this will particularly impact single women with children, whose opportunities for mobile occupations are much fewer than those of men, but chose to include this part of the policy regardless of the  vulnerable families who would be affected.

Ø      Local authorities are required to “strictly limit development in open countryside.”

Ø      Having stopped on land before seeking planning permission will count against applicants.

Impact (quoted from Johnson, Ruston and Willers, 2015)
from: http://travellerstimes.org.uk/Blogs--Features/Defining-Travellers-out-of-existence.aspxhttp://travellerstimes.org.uk/Blogs--Features/Defining-Travellers-out-of-existence.aspx

“Faced with relentless enforcement action taken against unauthorised encampments many Gypsies and Travellers will decide that it is no longer possible to continue travelling and will seek planning permission for a site. Yet in order to stand some chance of getting planning permission they will have to show that are still travelling! It’s a classic vicious circle of the Government’s own making!

“The position of those Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople who are too old or too ill to continue travelling is even more problematic. They will no longer fall within the planning definition of “gypsies and travellers” and “travelling showpeople” and will stand no real chance of obtaining planning permission for a caravan site despite the fact that they may be in greater need of a site than younger and more mobile members of their respective communities!

“We believe that these policy changes may be challengeable on grounds that they are discriminatory and violate the rights of Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople which are protected by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. We hope that those people most affected will take action to force the Government to reverse these policy changes and that this blog will encourage them to do so.”

Expressions of concern from the Traveller communities

Of most concern has been the issue of people’s ethnic identity being denied. 
“If I’m not a Gypsy, what am I?”

The future for younger members of the community appears especially problematic. If they have grown up on a settled site, it seems their ethnic identity will not be recognised, and they could be denied the right to even apply for planning permission for a site, or for a place on an existing site. “What’s going to happen?” said one young mother. “Are they going to tell us we aren’t Travellers any more, and bulldoze the site?”

Where authorities have accepted that they have a resident local population of ethnic Travellers, some quiet settled Traveller sites have been “tolerated”, rather than given planning permission. “I’ve been on a tolerated site for over thirty years now,” said one old age pensioner.  “We just don’t know what’s going to happen to us.”

Other Traveller sites have experienced a stressful series of time-limited planning permissions.  If the residents of these sites have made the effort to settle, and quietly pursued their local occupations, it seems they could be penalised by being re-defined as not-Travellers, and denied a renewal of their planning permission. “They’re trying to legislate us off the face of the earth,” said one such person.